radiocarbon dating definition dictionary Theories of Capitalism & Postcapitalism was a postgraduate unit designed and delivered at the School of Sociology, Politics & International Studies, University of Bristol in the 2016-2017 academic year, in ten two-hour seminars. Student feedback was overwhelmingly positive: ‘one of the most intellectually stimulating classes I’ve ever done’; ‘inspiring…changed how I think about the world around me.’ As I revise the course materials for a forthcoming book,  I’m sharing the course content here, including slides, discussion questions and reading lists, so that other people might be able to get something from it.

Public debate today is pervaded by discussions of capitalism and postcapitalism. This unit will equip you with the theoretical resources to critically navigate these debates. It does so by exploring the theoretical insights of, on the one hand, Marx’s critique of political economy, and, on the other, Frankfurt School critical theory, a synthesis represented today in the path-breaking work of the New Reading of Marx, including thinkers like Werner Bonefeld and Michael Heinrich. By reading the critique of political economy as a critical social theory, and critical theory as a critique of political economy, the course equips you with the theoretical tools to decode everyday categories like work, money, wealth, and subsistence in a sociological way. It focuses on: using the theory to embed these issues within contending visions of the future of capitalism, and how it can help us understand a set of concrete empirical issues confronting capitalist society in the 21st century. It will seek answers to questions such as: Have digital technologies changed work forever? Will robots make work redundant? Will a basic income liberate us from capitalism? What is the future of care and subsistence in a crisis of social reproduction? Can alternative currencies create a fairer monetary system? Is the central class divide in contemporary capitalism that between the 99% and the 1%? Engaging with these popular topics of political and sociological discussion from a standpoint informed by the most critical strands of contemporary sociological theory, this unit will allow you to assess the possibilities and limitations of social change in the present. This module will:

• Explain how critical approaches to capitalism differ from traditional and mainstream approaches, and show why they are relevant to the study of capitalism and its future.
• Demonstrate how theoretical approaches to capitalist economic and social categories can be applied to concrete areas of significant contemporary concern so as to further our understanding of the processes, relations and tendencies that underlie them.
• Develop your skills in writing and thinking critically about theoretical and empirical debates in sociology, social theory and the study of social issues and problems.

On successful completion of the unit, students will be able to:

1. Demonstrate a thorough knowledge of the relationship between the critique of political economy and critical social theory, and their difference from mainstream traditional understandings of capitalist society.
2. Demonstrate the ability to critically compare, contrast and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of different critical positions about capitalism and the future of capitalism.
3. Demonstrate the ability to apply concepts and approaches from the traditions of the critique of political economy and critical theory to contemporary economic and social issues, including: unemployment and technological change; financialisation, alternative currencies and the basic income; gender, care and social reproduction; and the international division of labour.

What is critique? What is critical theory? And how does it differ from mainstream and ‘traditional’ theory? What kinds of thing does critical theory look out for in analysing capitalism as a distinct social formation?

source url Slides

click here Essential Reading

1. Horkheimer, M., 1976[1937]. Traditional and Critical Theory. In Connerton, P. (ed.), 1976. Critical Sociology. London: Penguin, pp. 206-224.
2. Bonefeld, W., 2014. Chapter 1: Critical theory and the critique of political economy. In Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy: On Subversion and Negative Reason. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 1-17.
3. Heinrich, M., 2012. Chapter 1: Capitalism and Marxism and Chapter 2: The Object of Critique in the Critique of Political Economy. In An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx’s Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press, pp. 13-20 & pp. 29-38.
4. Adorno, T., 1976[1957]. Sociology and Empirical Research. In Connerton, P. (ed.), 1976. Critical Sociology. London: Penguin, pp. 237-257

order Lyrica samples Recommended Reading

1. Marcuse, H., 2002[1964] Introduction to the First Edition: The paralysis of criticism: society without opposition. in One Dimensional Man, Oxford: Routledge. pp. xxxviv-xlviii
2. Elbe, I., 2013. Between Marx, Marxism, and Marxisms – Ways of Reading Marx’s Theory. Viewpoint Magazine. 21st October 2013. https://viewpointmag.com/2013/10/21/between-marx-marxism-and-marxisms-ways-of-reading-marxs-theory/
3. Bonefeld, W., 2013. Antagonism and Negative Critique. Viewpoint Magazine. 15th September 2013. https://viewpointmag.com/2013/09/15/antagonism-and-negative-critique-an-interview/

http://fbmedical.fr/aftepaes/2950 Further Reading

1. Endnotes, 2010. Communisation and value-form theory. Endnotes #2: misery and the value-form. Available from: https://endnotes.org.uk/issues/2/en/endnotes-communisation-and-value-form-theory
2. Heinrich, M., 2007. Invaders from Marx: On the Uses of Marxian Theory, and the Difficulties of a Contemporary Reading. Left Curve 31. Available at http://www.oekonomiekritik.de/205Invaders.htm
3. Elson, D., 2015. The Value Theory of Labour. In Value: The Representation of Labour in Capitalism. London: Verso. pp. 115-180.

Are there better and worse critiques of capitalism? Can a critique be ‘uncritical’ on the level of theory? What makes a bad critique of capitalist society? What kinds of social relations are posited in conspiracy theories, and how do they differ from a critical approach? What is the relationship between truncated or distorted critiques of capitalism and anti-Semitic conspiracy theories?

http://uplaf.org/2016/03/14/2016-celebrating-class-announcements/embed/gaestebuch.php Slides

http://arbhojpuri.com/?5c7=a7 Essential Reading

1. Aufheben, 2017. The rise of conspiracy theories: Reification of defeat as the basis of explanation. Aufheben #24, pp. 12-28
2. Bonefeld, W., 2014. Chapter 9: Anti-capitalism and the elements of antisemitism: On theology and real abstractions. In Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy: On Subversion and Negative Reason. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 195-218.
3. Heinrich, M., 2012. ‘Excursus on antisemitism’ in Chapter 10: The Fetishism of Social Relations in Bourgeois Society. In An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx’s Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press, pp. 185-191
4. Adorno, T. W., and Horkheimer, M., 1972. Elements of Anti-Semitism: Limits of Enlightenment. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans. J. Cumming. London: Verso, pp. 168-208.

greece dating app Recommended Reading

1. Bonefeld, W., 2016b. Bringing critical theory back in at a time of misery: three beginnings without conclusion. Capital & Class, 40(2), pp.233-244.
2. Postone, M., 2006. History and Helplessness: Mass Mobilization and Contemporary Forms of Anticapitalism. Public Culture. 18(1), pp. 93-110.
3. Abromeit, J., 2016. Critical Theory and the Persistence of Right-Wing Populism. Logos: A Journal of Modern Society & Culture. 15(2-3) http://logosjournal.com/2016/abromeit/
4. Buruma, I., Where anti-capitalism and anti-semitism intersect. Times Literary Supplement. 6th July 2016. Available online at http://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/public/upping-the-antis/

http://josiart.at/rete/11067 Further Reading

1. Postone, M., 2010. Zionism, anti-semitism and the left. Solidarity 3/166, 4th February 2010. Available online at: http://www.krisis.org/2010/zionism-anti-semitism-and-the-left/
2. Schlembach, R., 2016. Chapter 5: Moishe Postone- Against the Standpoint of Old Europe. Against Old Europe: Critical Theory and Alter-Globalization Movements. London: Routledge, pp. 71-94.
3. Bonefeld, W., 2014. Antisemitism and the Power of Abstraction: From Political Economy to Critical Theory. Antisemitism and the Constitution of Sociology. ed. M. Stoetzler. University of Nebraska Press. pp. 314-332.

What makes a good critique of capitalist social relations from the perspective of critical theory? What do we critique when we critique capitalist society? Is it possible to critique capitalism in an uncritical way? To what extent do arguments for #Lexit (i.e. a left-wing case for Brexit) successfully craft a critique of capitalist social relations? What are their limitations? How should we posit the relationship between human action and social forms of domination and economic/legal abstraction?

http://boersenalltag.de/blog/post/2013/04/08/interview-beim-daf-dialog-semiconductor-und-aixtron/index.html Slides

Trading CFDs and/or soldi facili opzioni binarie involves significant risk of capital loss. Essential Reading

1. Critisticuffs 2014.A Companion to David Harvey’s Companion to Marx’ Capital, Chapter 1[online], Available: https://critisticuffs.org/texts/david-harvey/
2. Marx, K., 1990. The Fetishism of the Commodity and its Secret. Capital. Vol. I. trans. by B. Fowkes. London : Penguin, pp. 163-177.
3. Aufheben, 2017. Brexit means…what? Hapless ideology and practical consequences. Aufheben #24 2017, pp. 1-11 [Available at: https://libcom.org/library/brexit-means%E2%80%A6-what-hapless-ideology-practical-consequences]
4. Bonefeld, W., 2014. Chapter 2: Political economy and social constitution: On the meaning of critique AND Chapter 3: Society as subject and society as object: On social praxis. In Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy: On Subversion and Negative Reason. London: Bloomsbury, 21-52 & 53-75

youtube video strategie opzioni digitali Recommended Reading

1. Bellofiore, R., and Riva, T.R., 2015. The Neue Marx-Lekture: Putting the critique of political economy back into the critique of society. Radical Philosophy 189 Jan-Feb, pp.24-36.
2. Pitts, F.H., 2015. The critique of political economy as a critical social theory. Capital & Class 39(3), pp.537-544.
3. Holloway, J., 2002b. Change the World Without Taking Power. London: Pluto Press and Holloway, J., 2010. Crack Capitalism. London: Pluto Press.
4. Tischler S., 2005. Time of Reification and Time of Insubordination. Some Notes. In: W. Bonefeld and K. Psychopedis, eds. Human Dignity: Social Autonomy and the Critique of Capitalism. Aldershot: Ashgate. 131-143.

Further Reading

1. Bonefeld, W., 2016a. Negative Dialectics and the Critique of Economic Objectivity. History of the Human Sciences, 29(2), pp.60-76.
2. Bonefeld, W. 1994. Human Practice and Perversion: Between Autonomy and Structure. Common Sense, 15, pp.43-52. http://commonsensejournal.org.uk/issue-15/
3. Holloway, J., 2002a. Going in the Wrong Direction; Or, Mephistopheles – Not Saint Francis of Assisi Historical Materialism, 10(1), pp.79–91.
4. Arthur, C., 2013. The Practical Truth of Abstract Labour. In: R. Bellofiore, G. Starosta, and P. Thomas, eds. In Marx’s Laboratory: Critical Interpretations of the Grundrisse, Leiden: Brill, pp.101-120.

What is class from the perspective of critical theory broadly considered? How does the understanding of class as an antagonistic social relation differ from other theories of class in capitalist society? Does the Great British Class Survey reflect the reality of class society, empirically or theoretically? Is the central class divide in contemporary capitalism really that between the 99% and the 1%? What relations and social forms does this distinction obscure? Does class really boil down to the people versus the elites?

methylprednisolone usp 4 mg Slides

combinar diclofenaco ibuprofeno 300mg Essential Reading

1. Bonefeld, W., 2014. Chapter 4: Capital and labour: Primitive accumulation and the force of value AND Chapter 5: Class and struggle: On the false society. Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy. London: Bloomsbury. pp. 79-100 & 101-120
2. Toscano, A. and Woodcock, J., 2015. Spectres of Marxism: a comment on Mike Savage’s market model of class difference. The Sociological Review, 63, pp. 512–523
3. Critisticuffs, 2016. We Don’t Share Anything. Occupied Times. 3rd April 2016. [Available online at: https://theoccupiedtimes.org/?p=14219]
4. BBC Great British Class Survey site: http://www.bbc.co.uk/labuk/experiments/the-great-british-class-survey

can i buy zoloft over the counter Recommended Reading

1. Marx, K., 1976/1990. Chapter 4: The General Formula for Capital AND Marx, Chapter 24 Part 3 Division of Surplus-Value into Capital and Revenue. The Abstinence Theory. Capital Vol. I. trans. Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin, pp. 247-257 & pp. 738-746.
2. Tamas, G. M., 2009. Telling the Truth About Class. Socialist Register. 42. pp. 228-268
3. Adorno, T. W., 1942. Reflections on Class Theory. Available online at: http://platypus1917.org/wp-content/uploads/readings/adorno_classtheory1942.pdf
4. Gunn, R., 1987. Notes on Class. Common Sense, No. 2. Available online at: https://libcom.org/files/notes%20on%20class.pdf

Further Reading

1. Holloway, J., 2014. Read Capital: The First Sentence, Or Capital starts with Wealth, not with the Commodity. Grundrisse: Zeitschrift fur linke theorie und debate. [Available online at http://www.grundrisse.net/english-articles/Read_Capital_The_First_Sentence.htm#_ftn1]
2. Graeber, D., 2012. Chapter 1: On the Experience of Moral Confusion. Debt: The First 5,000 Years. New York: Random House, pp. 1-19.
3. Stutzle, I., 2012. Debt and punishment: A critical review of David Graeber’s Debt. analyse & kritik, 18th May 2012. [Available online at: http://communism.blogsport.eu/2012/06/12/debt-and-punishment-a-critical-review-of-david-graebers-debt/]
4. Clarke, S., 1978. Capital, Fractions of Capital and the State: ‘Neo-Marxist’ Analysis of the South African State. Capital and Class 2(2), Available online at: https://files.warwick.ac.uk/simonclarke/files/pubs/Fractions.pdf

What is social reproduction? How does a social reproduction standpoint change our focus on capitalism and the possibilities of postcapitalist transformation? To what extent can we say social reproduction is in crisis? How central is social reproduction to the definition and understanding of capitalism? What does an understanding of social reproduction and its crisis tell us about the activities and labour of care in the contemporary world? And to what extent does a conceptualisation of the ‘commons’ pose an alternative?


Essential Reading

1. Fraser, N., 2014. Behind Marx’s Hidden Abode. New Left Review 86, pp. 55-72
2. Caffentzis, G., 2002. On the Notion of a Crisis of Social Reproduction: A Theoretical Review. The Commoner No. 5, pp. 1-22. (Also in In Letters of Blood and Fire: Work, Machines, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Brooklyn: Common Notions, 2013. pp. 252-272) Available online: http://www.commoner.org.uk/caffentzis05.pdf
3. Federici, S., 2012. The Reproduction of Labor Power in the Global Economy and the Unfinished Feminist Revolution (2008) AND On Elder Care Work and the Limits of Marxism (2009). Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction and Feminist Struggle. Brooklyn: Common Notions, pp. 91-111 & pp. 115-125. Both readings available in The Commoner No. 15 Winter 2012, special issue on ‘Care Work and The Commons’: http://www.commoner.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/08-federici.pdf and http://www.commoner.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/10-federici.pdf
4. Bhattacharya, T., 2015. How Not To Skip Class: Social Reproduction of Labor and the Global Working Class. Viewpoint Magazine. Issue 5: Social Reproduction. [Available online at: https://viewpointmag.com/2015/10/31/how-not-to-skip-class-social-reproduction-of-labor-and-the-global-working-class/]

Recommended Reading

1. Fraser, N., 2016. Contradictions of Capital and Care. New Left Review 100. July-August 2016, pp. 99-117. https://newleftreview.org/II/100/nancy-fraser-contradictions-of-capital-and-care
2. Leonard, S., and Fraser, N., 2016. Capitalism’s Crisis of Care. Dissent Magazine Fall 2016. https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/nancy-fraser-interview-capitalism-crisis-of-care
3. Ferguson, S., and McNally, D., 2015. Social Reproduction Beyond Intersectionality: An Interview. Viewpoint Magazine. Issue 5: Social Reproduction. [Available online at: https://viewpointmag.com/2015/10/31/social-reproduction-beyond-intersectionality-an-interview-with-sue-ferguson-and-david-mcnally/]
4. Weeks, K., and Curcio, A., 2015. Social Reproduction, Neoliberal Crisis, and the Problem with Work. Viewpoint Magazine. Issue 5: Social Reproduction. [Available online at: https://viewpointmag.com/2015/10/31/social-reproduction-neoliberal-crisis-and-the-problem-with-work-a-conversation-with-kathi-weeks/]

Further Reading

1. Marx, K., 1990/1976. Chapter 23: Simple Reproduction AND Chapter 26: Primitive Accumulation. Capital. Vol. I, trans. B. Fowkes. London: Penguin. pp. 711-724 & pp. 873-876.
2. Dalla Costa, M., 1995. Capitalism and Reproduction’ in Bonefeld, W. Gunn, R., J. Holloway and K. Psychopedis (eds.) Open Marxism Vol. III, Pluto Press: London, pp. 7-16
3. Dalla Costa, M., 2015. Family, welfare and the state. Between progressivism and the New Deal. Brooklyn: Common Notions.
4. Brown, G., Dowling, E., Harvie, D., Milburn, K., 2012. Careless Talk: Social Reproduction and Fault Lines of the Crisis in the United Kingdom. Social Justice Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 78-98.

How does the reading of Marx advocated by thinkers influenced by the Fragment on Machines differ from the critical readings explored in the first half of the unit? To what factors can we attribute the increasing popularity of the Fragment scenario among intellectual, media and political audiences? How far does it describe a real possibility with reference to the categories of interpretation and understanding outlined in the first half of the unit? Does the Fragment describe a really existing capitalism, a future capitalism, or a fully postcapitalist vision of the future? What are the implications for how we work and labour, and to what extent do changes in the latter signify or catalyse changes in the capitalist system more widely? What kind of different critical and analytical choices are at play here? Can a critical theory of capitalism be positive as well as negative about present conditions?


Essential Reading

1. Marx, K., 1973/1993. Grundrisse. London: Penguin, pp. 704-711
2. Mason, P., 2015. Chapter 5: Prophets of Postcapitalism. In Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future. London: Allen Lane, pp. 133-145.
3. Hardt, M., and Negri, A., 2001. Chapter 3.4: Postmodernization, Or The Informatization of Production, Chapter 4.1: Virtualities. Empire. Harvard University Press (pp. 280-303, pp. 353-369)
4. Lazzarato M., 1996. Immaterial Labor. In: P. Virno and M. Hardt, eds. Radical Thought in Italy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp.133-150.

Recommended Reading

1. Caffentzis, G., 2005. Immeasurable Value? An Essay on Marx’s Legacy. The Commoner #10, p. 87-114 http://www.commoner.org.uk/10caffentzis.pdf
2. Caffentzis, G., 2013. ‘A Critique of “Cognitive Capitalism”’. In In Letters of Blood and Fire: Work, Machines, and Value, Oakland: PM Press, 2013, pp. 95-126
3. Heinrich, M., 2013. The “Fragment on Machines”: A Marxian Misconception in the Grundrisse and its Overcoming in Capital. In Bellofiore, R., G. Starosta and P. Thomas (eds.) In Marx’s Laboratory: Critical Interpretations of the Grundrisse. Leiden: Brill, pp. 197-212
4. Pitts, F. H., 2016. Beyond the Fragment: The Postoperaist Reception of Marx’s Fragment on Machines and its Relevance Today. School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies Working Paper Series, 2016-02. University of Bristol. Available online at http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/spais/documents/Working%20Paper%2002_16_FHP.pdf

Further Reading

1. Noys, B., 2012. Introduction, Chapter 4: Immeasurable Life and Conclusion. In The Persistence of the Negative: A Critique of Contemporary Continental Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 1-22, pp. 106-133 & pp. 162-175)
2. Doogan, K., 2009. Introduction and Chapter 1: From Post-Industrial Society to New Capitalism: The Evolution of a Narrative of Social Change. New Capitalism? Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 1-15 & pp. 16-42.
3. Pitts, F. H., 2015. Review of Paul Mason, Postcapitalism. Marx and Philosophy Review of Books. 4th September 2015. http://marxandphilosophy.org.uk/reviewofbooks/reviews/2015/2008
4. Virno, P., 2001. General Intellect. In Zanini and Fadini (eds) Lessico Postfordista. Milan: Feltrinelli. Available online at http://www.generation-online.org/p/fpvirno10.htm

To what extent does automation potentiate a transition from capitalist to postcapitalist society? What might the critical theory approaches covered in the first half of the unit make of the claim that robots will free us from the compulsion to labour? What important elements of capitalist social relations are absent in accounts of a fully automated post-work future? What assumptions are present, and are these critical or ‘traditional’ in the way they understand capitalism? What is the relationship between labour- or the lack of it- and capitalist social forms like value, wealth and money? Can we escape one by escaping the other?


Essential Reading

1. Mason, P., 2015. Chapter 6: Towards the Free Machine. Postcapitalism. London: Allen Lane, pp. 164-176.
2. Srnicek, N., and Williams, A., 2015. Chapter 6: The Future Isn’t Working AND Chapter 7: Post-Work Imaginaries. Inventing the Future. London: Verso, pp. 85-106 & pp. 107-129
3. Weeks, K., 2011. Introduction: The Problem with Work. The Problem With Work. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 1-36.
4. Caffentzis, G., 1999. The End of Work or the Renaissance of Slavery? A Critique of Rifkin and Negri. Common Sense 24, 1999, pp. 20-38. (Also in In Letters of Blood and Fire: Work, Machines, and Value, Oakland: PM Press, 2013, pp. 66-81.) Available online: http://commonsensejournal.org.uk/files/2010/08/CommonSense24.pdf

Recommended Reading

1. Adorno, T. W., 2003a. Reflections on Class Theory’. In Can One Live After Auschwitz? A Philosophical Reader, ed. R. Tiedemann, trans. R. Livingstone. Stanford University Press. pp.93-110 and Adorno, T. W., 2003b. Late Capitalism or Industrial Society? The Fundamental Question of the Present Structure of Society. In Can One Live After Auschwitz? A Philosophical Reader, ed. R. Tiedemann, trans. R. Livingstone. Stanford University Press. pp. 111-125
2. Virno, P., 1996. “The Ambivalence of Disenchantment”. trans. M. Turtis, in Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics, ed. by P. Virno and M. Hardt. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 13-36 and Virno, P., 2001. “General Intellect” [online], trans. by Arianna Bove, available at www.generation-online.org/p/fpvirno10.htm [accessed 1st January 2012]
3. Heinrich, M.. 2013a. Crisis Theory, the Law of the Tendency of the Profit Rate to Fall, and Marx’s Studies in the 1870s. Monthly Review, April 2013, 15-32. See also Chapter 7 in Heinrich, M., 2012. An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx’s Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.
4. Clarke, Simon. 1989. The Marxist Theory of Overaccumulation and Crisis, presentation given at Conference of Socialist Economists 1989: Value Crisis and the State Stream. Available online at: https://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/~syrbe/pubs/CSECONF1989.pdf and Clarke, Simon. 1992. The Global Accumulation of Capital and the Periodisation of the Capitalist State Form. Open Marxism Volume I: Dialectics and History, eds. W. Bonefeld, R. Gunn and K. Psychopedis, 133-150. London: Pluto Press.

Further Reading

1. Williams, A., and Srnicek, N., 2013. #Accelerate: Manifesto for an Accelerationist Politics. Critical Legal Thinking. 14th May. http://criticallegalthinking.com/2013/05/14/accelerate-manifesto-for-an-accelerationist-politics/
2. Doogan, 2009. Chapter 2: Technological Change: Autonomization and Dematerialization. New Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press. pp. 43-62
3. Mackay, R., and Avanessian, A., 2015. Introduction. #Accelerate: The Accelerationist Reader. Falmouth: Urbanomic, pp. 1-50. Available online at: https://www.urbanomic.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Accelerate-Introduction.pdf
4. Dinerstein, A.C., Taylor, G., and Pitts. F.H., 2016. A post-work economy of robots and machines is a bad utopia for the left. The Conversation. 23rd May 2016. https://theconversation.com/a-post-work-economy-of-robots-and-machines-is-a-bad-utopia-for-the-left-59134

Does the provision of a basic income guarantee a future where we no longer have to work to eat? What is the relationship between money, commodities and labour that proponents of the basic income posit, and how might the critical approaches to economic objectivity outlined in the first part of the unit differ? What is the wage, and how far does the basic income travel from it? What would the basic income need to do or look like to transcend capitalist social relations and bring about the postcapitalist society its proponents suggest it would?


Essential Reading

1. Denning, M., 2010. Wageless Life, New Left Review. Nov-Dec 2010, pp. 79-97 https://newleftreview.org/II/66/michael-denning-wageless-life
2. Mason, P., 2015. Chapter 10: Project Zero. Postcapitalism. London: Allen Lane, pp. 280-289
3. Weeks, K., 2011. Chapter 3: Working Demands: From Wages for Housework to Basic Income. The Problem With Work. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 113-150.
4. Critisticuffs 2016. What is wrong with free money? Kittens #5, October 2016, pp. 1-7. Available online at: http://antinational.org/en/what-wrong-free-money

Recommended Reading

1. Marx, K., 1990/1976. Chapter 6: The Sale and Purchase of Labour-Power. Capital Vol. I. Trans. B. Fowkes. London: Penguin, pp. 270-280.
2. Federici, S., 2012. Introduction AND Wages against Housework (1975). Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction and Feminist Struggle. Brooklyn: Common Notions, pp. 5-22.
3. Twaites, R., Griffiths, B., and Lewis-Morgan, P., 2016. Universal Basic Income: The Great Escape? The Project: A Socialist Journal. 14th August 2016 http://www.socialistproject.org/issues/august-2016/universal-basic-income-great-escape/
4. Cruddas, J., and Kibasi, T., 2016. A universal basic mistake. Prospect. July 2016. http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/features/a-universal-basic-mistake

Further Reading

1. Marx, K., 1990/1976. Chapter 15 Part 5: The Struggle Between Worker and Machines. Capital. Vol. I., Trans. B. Fowkes. London: Penguin, pp. 553-564) AND Polanyi, K., 2001. Chapter 7: Speenhamland, 1795 Polanyi AND Chapter 8: Antecedents and Consequences. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press., pp. 81-89 & pp. 91-107)
2. Nieswandt, K., 2016. Basic income after automation? That’s not how capitalism works! The Conversation, 7th October 2016. https://theconversation.com/basic-income-after-automation-thats-not-how-capitalism-works-65023
3. Pitts, F.H., 2016. A Crisis of Measurability? Critiquing Postoperaismo on Labour, Value and the Basic Income. Capital and Class [online], Available from: http://cnc.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/09/21/0309816816665579.full.pdf+html
4. Weeks, K., and Cruz, K., 2016. A feminist case for Basic Income: An interview with Kathi Weeks. Compass. 25th August 2016. https://www.compassonline.org.uk/a-feminist-case-for-basic-income-an-interview-with-kathi-weeks/

Do alternative currencies really present a new way of acquiring the things we need? To what extent are they much the same as the currencies we have currently? What social relations remain in a world where our access to goods and services is still mediated by money? Does money itself imply the compulsion to labour? Can money be retained in a postcapitalist society? How specific are money and value to a capitalist society, and what is the relationship to labour that they posit? What are the alternatives to this?


Essential Reading

1. Lotz, C., 2014. Introduction, Chapter 1: The Capitalist Schema AND Chapter 2: Money. In The Capitalist Schema: Time, Money and the Culture of Abstraction. Lanham: Lexington Books, pp. xiii-xxii, pp. 1-12 & pp. 27-58 (skip pp. 58-67)
2. Kittens, 2014. Bitcoin: Finally Fair Money? Furball #0 [Available online at: https://gegen-kapital-und-nation.org/en/bitcoin-finally-fair-money/]
3. Neary, M., and Taylor, G., 1998. Chapter 4: LETS Abolish Money? Is there a Community Outside the Community of Money? In Money and the Human Condition. London: Macmillan, 91-123

Recommended Reading

1. Lanchester, J., 2016. When Bitcoin Grows Up. London Review of Books. 21st April 2016, pp. 3-12 http://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n08/john-lanchester/when-bitcoin-grows-up
2. Cleaver, H., 2011. Work Refusal and Self-Organisation. In A. Nelson and F. Timmerman, eds. Life Without Money: Building Fair and Sustainable Economies, London: Pluto Press, pp.47-69.
3. Zechner, M., and Hansen, B. R., 2015. Building Power in a Crisis of Social Reproduction. ROAR Magazine, Issue 0: Building Power. https://roarmag.org/magazine/building-power-crisis-social-reproduction/

How would life and work need to be organised to fulfil truly ‘postcapitalist’ characteristics, and what is the evidence that these forms of organisation are in development at present? What needs to be got rid of and what needs to be retained? More broadly: how does theory relate to practice? What do different ways of conceiving and critiquing the world imply for how we approach it politically, empirically and practically in our everyday lives?


Essential Reading

1. Dinerstein, A. C., 2010. Autonomy in Latin America: between reisstance and integration. Echoes from the Piqueteros experience. Community Development Journal 45(3), pp. 356-66)
2. Dinerstein, A. C., 2013a. From Corporatist to Autonomous: Unemployed Workers Organisations and the remaking of labour subjectivity in Argentina. In Howell, J. (ed), Non Governmental Public Action and Social Justice, Vol. 2. London: Palgrave, pp. 36-59
3. Dinerstein, A. C., 2013b. The Hidden Side of SSE: Social Movements and the Appropriation and “Translation” of SSE into Policy (Latin America). United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
4. Dinerstein, A. C., 2014. The Dream of Dignified Work: On Good and Bad Utopias. Development and Change 45(5), pp. 1037-1058

Formative Assessment: Book Review (1000 words)
Review one book from the selection below. The task will assess your ability to critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the book as a piece of critical scholarship on contemporary capitalism and/or its future, contextualise it within contemporary debates around critical approaches to capitalist society, and apply this understanding to the concrete subject matter covered in the text. Written feedback will aid you in developing your written use of critical concepts and approaches, and building effective critiques and arguments in dialogue with those of others. This will help your progress towards the summative assessment. Below is the selection of books from which you can choose one to review. They are all either very recent or relatively recent, and all appear in the required reading for various weeks of the unit. Please refrain from reading existing reviews of the books- it will be better for your assignment to approach it from an original and interesting angle.

1. Caffentzis, G., 2013. In Letters of Blood and Fire: Work, Machines, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Brooklyn: Common Notions
2. Dalla Costa, M., 2015. Family, welfare and the state. Between progressivism and the New Deal. Brooklyn: Common Notions
3. Dinerstein, A., 2015. The Politics of Autonomy in Latin America: The Art of Organising Hope. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
4. Dyer-Witheford, N., 2015. Cyber-Proletariat: Global Labour in the Digital Vortex. London: Pluto Press
5. Federici, S., 2012. Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction and Feminist Struggle. Brooklyn: Common Notions
6. Holloway, J., 2010. Crack Capitalism. London: Pluto Press
7. Lotz, C., 2014. The Capitalist Schema: Time, Money and the Culture of Abstraction. Lanham: Lexington Books
8. Mason, P., 2015. Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future. London: Penguin
9. Srnicek, N., and Williams, A., 2015. Inventing the Future. London: Verso
10. Weeks, K., 2011. The Problem With Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics and Postwork Imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press

Here are some examples of review articles that you can use for inspiration about how to approach book reviewing. Each surveys Bonefeld’s Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy, a core reading for this unit. They each take slightly different perspectives and make useful reading for the unit more generally:

1. Conway, L., 2014. Review: Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy. The Project 4th November. http://www.socialistproject.org/issues/november-2014/review-critical-theory-and-the-critique-of-political-economy/
2. Pitts, F.H., 2015. The critique of political economy as a critical social theory [Review of Bonefeld, Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy]. Capital & Class 39(3), pp.537-544. http://cnc.sagepub.com/content/39/3/537.extract
3. Robinson, J., 2015. Review of Bonefeld, Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy. Marx & Philosophy Review of Books. 22nd January. http://marxandphilosophy.org.uk/reviewofbooks/reviews/2015/1481
4. Schulman, J., 2015. On Critical Theory, Value Theory, and So-Called Traditional Marxism [Review of Bonefeld, Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy]. New Politics. 24th June. http://newpol.org/content/critical-theory-value-theory-and-so-called-traditional-marxism

Summative Assessment: Essay (4000 words)
The summative essay asks you to apply one of the theoretical perspectives covered to a concrete substantive issue in contemporary social and economic life cutting across the empirical and theoretical topics discussed over the course of the ten seminars. The questions ware designed so as to test your ability to apply critical theory and the critique of political economy practically to real-world sociological issues. These might include, but are not limited to: the future of work, the threat of automation, the crisis of social reproduction, building concrete alternatives, money, finance, and wealth inequalities, class struggle and new forms of resistance, and gendered/global divisions of labour:

1. ‘Capitalism begins not with the offer of work, but with the imperative to earn a living’ (Denning 2010, p. 80). Critically assess this claim with reference to post-work proposals for a universal basic income and/or the automation of labour.
2. ‘The context of crisis and generalized vulnerability opens onto a myriad of struggles around social rights, resources and survival, all of which put life at their centre. Everyday life, bodily survival, and collective life: the problem of human needs touches most in the crisis’ (Zechner and Hansen 2015, online). Discuss this claim with reference to one or more examples of contemporary political or social practice.
3. ‘What really does it mean to say ‘no’ in a society that is governed by the movement of economic abstractions?’ (Bonefeld 2016, p. 237). Answer this question by critically assessing one or more examples of contemporary political or social thought or practice.
4. ‘Is there a community outside the community of money?’ (Neary and Taylor 1998, p. 91). Answer this question by critically comparing proposals for the universal basic income and/or alternative currencies.
5. To what extent do proposals for ‘postcapitalist’ alternatives address the crisis of social reproduction? Critically discuss with reference to one example from the following: basic income, automation, alternative currencies.
6. ‘In this kind of working existence it becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish leisure time from work time. In a sense, life becomes inseparable from work’ (Lazzarato 1996, pp. 137-8). Critically assess this claim with reference to conceptualisations of ‘immaterial labour’ in contemporary capitalism.
7. ‘The individual carries his social power, as well as his bond with society, in his pocket’ (Marx 1993, pp. 156-7). Discuss with reference to proposals for a basic income and/or alternative currencies.
8. To what extent is automation liberating? Critically assess this question with reference to postcapitalist visions of the future.
9. Discuss the strengths and limitations of Mason’s understanding of the basic income as a ‘transitional measure’ for changes in the form of wages and social reproduction.

These will be useful for additional readings and sources relating to empirical areas and theoretical perspectives covered, including news and analysis and scholarly material like books and articles.

Peer-reviewed academic journals
Capital & Class http://cnc.sagepub.com/
Historical Materialism http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/1569206x
Rethinking Marxism http://rethinkingmarxism.org/
Critical Sociology http://crs.sagepub.com/
Telos http://journal.telospress.com/
Crisis and Critique http://crisiscritique.org/
Work, Employment & Society http://wes.sagepub.com/
Economy & Society http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/reso20/current
Sociology http://soc.sagepub.com/
Sociological Review http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1467-954X
Ephemera http://www.ephemerajournal.org/
TripleC http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC
Theory, Culture & Society http://tcs.sagepub.com/
South Atlantic Quarterly http://saq.dukejournals.org/
Capitalism, Nature, Socialism http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rcns20/current
Mediations http://mediationsjournal.org/
Antipode http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8330

Periodicals, magazines and other publications
New Left Review https://newleftreview.org/
London Review of Books http://www.lrb.co.uk/
Viewpoint https://viewpointmag.com/
Aufheben http://libcom.org/aufheben
Endnotes https://endnotes.org.uk/
Kittens https://gegen-kapital-und-nation.org/en/
ROAR https://roarmag.org/
Monthly Review http://monthlyreview.org/
Radical Philosophy https://www.radicalphilosophy.com/
Dissent https://www.dissentmagazine.org/
New Politics http://newpol.org/
Jacobin https://www.jacobinmag.com/
N+1 https://nplusonemag.com/
The Baffler http://thebaffler.com/
Socialist Register http://socialistregister.com/
Common Sense Journal http://commonsensejournal.org.uk/
Marx & Philosophy Review of Books https://marxandphilosophy.org.uk/reviewofbooks
The Commoner http://www.commoner.org.uk/

Academic and research networks
Conference of Socialist Economists http://www.cseweb.org.uk/
Critical Theories of Antisemitism Network https://criticaltheoriesofantisemitism.net/
International Initiative for Promoting Political Economy http://iippe.org/wp/
Marx & Philosophy Society https://marxandphilosophy.org.uk/society

Websites, blogs and groups
Marxists Internet Archive https://www.marxists.org/
Libcom https://libcom.org/
Cominsitu https://cominsitu.wordpress.com/
Critisticuffs https://critisticuffs.org/
Plan C http://www.weareplanc.org/
The Project: A Socialist Journal http://www.socialistproject.org/
Generation Online http://generation-online.org/
Uninomade http://www.uninomade.org/category/language/english/
Platypus http://platypus1917.org/

Verso Books https://www.versobooks.com/
Pluto Books http://www.plutobooks.com/page.asp?pid=index
Common Notions http://www.commonnotions.org/
Semiotext(e) http://semiotexte.com/
Autonomedia http://autonomedia.org/
Monthly Review Press http://monthlyreview.org/press/
Zero Books http://www.zero-books.net/
Urbanomic https://www.urbanomic.com/
Historical Materialism Series http://www.brill.com/publications/historical-materialism-book-series Haymarket Books https://www.haymarketbooks.org/
AK Press https://www.akpress.org/
MayFly Books http://mayflybooks.org/
Minor Compositions http://www.minorcompositions.info/
PM Press http://www.pmpress.org/content/index.php